Peter Hitchens?

Is Peter Hitchens losing touch?

The excellent Mail on Sunday Columnist (among other things) last week failed to mention in his column the stolen BNP list and subsequent persecution of some of those on the list.

The fact that Peter never mentioned any of this I found strange being as it could be HIM, with his outspoken right wing views who is persecuted next.

This week in his column there is surprisingly no mention of the Damian Green arrest.

Again this puzzled me as of course they could soon come for Peter, if it is deemed that he has written the wrong thing at the wrong time about the wrong person.

I might ask 'what's going on Peter?'

Idiocracy Case No1?

The controller of the BBC, Jay Hunt, yesterday described Jonathan Ross as 'a responsible broadcaster'.

Is Ms Hunt a case of idiocracy perhaps?

British Muslim Terrorists in India?

Were British Muslims involved in the Bombay attacks?

Some claim they were.

The 'rumours' have reached as high as Gordon Brown who said it was 'too soon to speculate'.

Since Gordon said that, there has been virtual silence on the subject.
A news blackout?

Soon, I think the shit's going to hit the fan over this one.

Bombay BBC!

The two very nice 'right on' news readers on the BBC News coverage of the Indian terrorist attacks last night, were very careful to say 'Mumbai' when talking about the city I know as Bombay (Mumbai Duck anyone?).

I laughed out loud when the BBC's India Correspondent came on (an Indian lady) and promptly refered to the city as Bombay!

Ha!

The two news readers looked like they were sucking lemons!

One in the eye for the oh so very PC BBC!

BNP Persecution

Who are the most persecuted minority in Britain today?

Why BNP members of course!

Could you imagine stolen, illegal lists of say, homosexuals or Communists or Freemasons or cross dressers or sex offenders or radical Muslims being published?

No of course not.

The self same liberal left wingers who are now gleefully and illegally publishing the BNP members list and those that are gloating over it would be up in arms over the human rights violations of the above groups.

And as for Labour's Jacqui Smith smugly wondering why people should be 'ashamed of being named as BNP members', well it's not that they are ashamed, it's that in the main they fear verbal and physical attacks by Smith's party supporters!

Can you imagine the intimidation of any other minority group (including paedophiles!) being tolerated by the authorities and media in the way that has happened with the BNP story this week?

No, BNP members truly are the modern day equivalent of 16Th century Catholics in England or the Communists in America during the McCarthyism era.

The liberal fascists that rule this country have never sunk so low.

Who's next??

Idiocracy

Have you seen the film Idiocracy?

For those of you who haven't I'll briefly give you the gist.

A man 'awakes' five hundred years into the future and finds that society has 'dumbed down' so much that he is now the most intelligent man alive.

Needless to say the world has gone to pot and nothing works.

Well I think that quite possibly if we continue with the current and widespread trend of promoting people within the workplace (also in the media and public office) based purely on their gender or ethnicity as opposed to their ability to do the job then this 'Idiocracy' scenario could well await us!

Don't believe me? well just take a look around you every day, in your own life and on the news for example.

Do you see many people in prime jobs - for reasons previously mentioned - who are wholly unqualified for and incompetent at the roles?

Need I say more!?

Sir Trevor Brooking and Immigration

Sir Trevor Brooking has been talking recently of his concerns over the number of foreign players coming into the English game (football of course) and the effect this has on our own home grown players.

Brooking argues - rightly I believe - that by bringing in foreigners who are already trained to a high standard by foreign clubs our clubs no longer have to go to the time, trouble and expense of training our own youngsters.

He argues that this is obviously bad for our youngsters and bad for the English (and British) game.

Commentators in and out of the game and from Left and Right pretty much agree with him.

There are obvious differences of course but doesn't his argument obviously strike a chord in relation to wider society in general, and if - as it is - his argument is agreed by nearly all in relation to football, then why is it that the same argument applied to society in general is usually howled down?