I'll be brief.Channel 4 is to broadcast a documentary (part of a series) on 1st Feb 7.00pm called 'Christianity: A History'.
This particular episode deals with the Crusades.
It is to be presented by Rageh Omaar, a black Somalian Muslim.
Would it have been too much to expect a British TV company like Channel 4 to perhaps show things from a white Christian point of view - being that the Crusaders were white Christians?
Maybe they are showing it from a white Christian point of view but are just using a black Somalian Muslim to present the programme. I doubt it.
Behaviour worthy of the BBC I think.
5 comments:
I wonder if the focus on the Crusades will start at the time of Christians heading to the middle East or about 150 years before.
At that time 1/3 of the Christian world including Spain was under the heel of the moslem barbarians.
Even cities such as Rome itself had been looted, in Milan a mosque was built after the church was burned down.
Methinks selective history will be used.
Absolutely typical.
Tere was a program on Islam not long ago done by a none muslim.
But i do agree, islam hate all other religions so to do a report on any other kind of religion would only provoke a bias report.
Its bollocks complete utter bollocks.
The BBC however has suprissed me in their stance on the apeal its a shame that every other Channel has sold out to terrorism.
Hell I would love a chance to do a program on that, I did the Crusades and the factors that led up to it for my history exam in School.
I shall be watching just to find what he misses out, what he spins and what lies he may well slip in.
Fidothedog:
I shall be watching as well.
Monkey:
I'm also very surprised by the BBC with their stance over the appeal.
Post a Comment