Showing posts with label lib dem's. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lib dem's. Show all posts

Monday, 10 May 2010

Lib Dem's in the Garden of Eden

The Lib Dem's are in the Garden of Eden at the moment and seduced by the thought of a smidgen of power are about to bite the apple.
They will regret it forever.

Sunday, 18 April 2010

Loony Left Lib Dem's

Nick Clegg has made a bit of an impression this week hasn't he?
I've heard people saying 'I was going to vote UKIP but I think I'll vote Lib Dems now after seeing that Nick Clegg on TV the other night' and most notably, in my local newspaper someone interviewed on the street said 'I'm quite a right wing person and I've had enough of Labour and having listened to Nick Clegg on TV I think I'll vote for him'. I kid you not.
Have any of these Lib Dem converts read their policies?
I invite anyone to go on their website and look at their policies, I won't go into details but they really ARE the loony left.

Thursday, 19 November 2009

British Population To Hit 74 Million

It is reported today by the Office For National Statistics that they expect the population of Great Britain to grow to an amazing 74 million people within the next 20 years.
The rise, they say will be driven mainly by immigration and the high birth rates of immigrants and ethnic minorities.
Even the stupid among us can now surely see that white people will be a minority in this land within a couple of generations.
Does this matter? Does mass immigration matter? If there are free and open borders - as advocated by the Liberal Party and the Greens (and I think secretly by the Tories, and not so secretly by the Labour party if 'the proof of the pudding' is anything to go by) then if there are these free and open borders we can also travel/emigrate freely. One world one nation one race etc. But that's no good at the moment really because with free and open borders and the free movement of people economies would collapse. So at the moment at least (ever?) 'free movement' I don't think is sustainable. In an ideal - and perhaps non capitalist - world maybe (arguably) it would be. I personally think that most migrants are economic migrants so is capitalism (and corruption) the real driver of immigration? If every country in the world had a decent and fair economy with good social conditions for the people then they would by and large have no great desire to move I think. But that's not easy to achieve!

What about white people in Britain becoming the new ethnic minority in their home land? Does this matter? In left wing thinking this clearly does not matter. Left wing ideology is supposedly colour blind.
But in my view multiculturalism just is not working. There are massive tensions brought on by it, through cultural differences, religion and yes, race. It's not working (even according to Trevor Phillips), so until it does work (and I honestly don't think it can) then one particular race being ethnically cleansed from it's homeland is wrong, be that race Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, Native Americans in America etc etc - or Whites in Europe.

Labour, Liberal, Conservative or The Greens WILL NOT tackle immigration. Period. The Liberals and the Greens don't want to and won't really claim to while Labour and the Tories will both talk tough but both are committed to Europe and multiculturalism (ask them), so they won't tackle it either.

So who will? UKIP? Maybe. The BNP? Definitely.
So there it is, the reality. You either accept/embrace that Britain will soon become a non white (minority white), non Christian, very overcrowded country or you vote BNP.
An easy choice for some a 'devil and the deep blue sea' choice for others.

Sunday, 3 May 2009

Lib Dem's and the Gurkha's.

So the Lib Dem's backed the campaign to let the Gurkha's in.

A worthy campaign that I agreed with, but the Lib Dem's? The Lib Dem's do not believe in border controls of any sort, they believe in free movement of all people around the world, without impingement.

So they are not sticking up for the Gurkha's per se, they are saying 'let them in' but they are also saying 'let everyone in, at all times, whoever they are'.

A bit disingenuous I'd say.